Mike Huckabee, who wants to become the president of the United States, did some more gay bashing yesterday during an interview of Beliefnet. He stated that “Marriage has historically, as long as there’s been human history, meant a man and a woman in a relationship for life. Once we change that definition, then where does it go from there?…Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again“. Okay, so let’s see if we understand this man’s logic. He claims gay people shouldn’t be allowed to marry, as then inevitably a man will be able to mary a child or an animal? That’s strange. So that second adaption would pass as a law without any trouble? The word “far fecthed” doesn’t even begin to describe this way of reasoning. The other argument that gay people shouldn’t be allowed to marry, is that in the old days, that didn’t happen either. Ok, so mister Huckabee doesn’t want anything to be different then in the very beginning of human life? I propose he then gives up electricity, the internet and his mobile phone as well. Things that didn’t used to be like that, and now do exist: that’s called “progress”.
Recent Posts
Tags
Alice Nkom
brandon
Bulgary
Cameroon
death
death sentence
discrimination
ellen degeneres
Emmanuel Balep
equal
Fred Phelps
Gay
gay activist
gay adoption
Gay discrimination
gay mariage
gay marriage
great brittain
Heath Ledger
Huckabee
human rights
international gay news
Iran
Italy
larry
Lazare Baeeg
lesbian
lgbt
Mariano Rajoy
Mehdi Kazemi
murder
Pegah Emambakhsh
politics
president
presidential elections
religion
romania
Sally Kern
Spain
statistics
stories
Tayyab and Yazdan
threat
Tony Dikongue
Westboro Baptist Church